On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 05:59:47PM +0200, Christian Marillat wrote: > Daniel Kobras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 05:20:27PM +0200, Christian Marillat wrote: > >> Daniel Kobras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> > Yep, spotted the new packages in incoming after I sent out the report. > >> > Closing it with the proper version now. Are you going to address the > >> > other items I mentioned in the report? > >> > >> No, you can't change soname library like that. > > > > I don't see what change you're referring to here. I asked you to include > > a conflict/replaces for an old woody package that contained the same > > filenames, and I asked to check with upstream whether this > > awkward-looking soname change was intentional. > > The latest Debian changelog entry is explicit : > > ,---- > | libquicktime (1:0.9.7-0.2) unstable; urgency=low > | > | * NMU. > | * Fix typo in previous changelog entry. > | * libquicktime0 replaces libquicktime1 1:0.9.7-0.1 > | > | -- Christian Marillat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sun, 21 Aug 2005 23:59:12 +0200 > `----
This addresses the main problem mentioned in this bug report. I'd like to know what you intend to do about the further issues I raised. > > It was closed already, so ne need to mail -done. All I added was > > information on the version the bug was closed in. Did you miss > > http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/07/msg00010.html > > maybe? > > And ? As I'm saying this bug is fixed and don't need any tag. Sure, but why did you remove the tag (versioning, really) when it was correct? Versioning is the default now, and mailing to -done without a Version: pseudo-header is deprecated when you can pinpoint the fix to a specific version. Regards, Daniel. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
