Daniel Kobras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 07:30:41PM +0200, Christian Marillat wrote:
[...] > - You've introduced to Debian a library package that decreased its > soname to a version that was in use some time ago. This looks dubious > and can give rise to problems if the ABI now differs from the one used > in the first .0 soname version. Do you intend to check with upstream > about this potential problem? I've introduced nothing. The previous package name was a hack. The soname for quicktime was always 0. The 1 soname has been introduced buy the Debian maintainer. Read the diff for quicktime 0.6.14 > - In this light, I'd like you to reconsider #323659 and add a > conflict/replaces on libquicktime4linux0, the package which first > provided the current soname in woody. As I said in the bug report, this package doesn't exist in Debian. > - Do you intend to inform the maintainers of packages that depend on > libquicktime1 that these packages are now uninstallable and need to be > rebuilt? Why ? This is not my package. For me this discusion is closed. I don't intent to spend my time with this package. Now we have a recent quicktime package and I'm happy. Christian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
