RISKÓ Gergely <ri...@debian.org> wrote: > On Tue, 29 Jun 2010 13:18:55 -0400, Peter Galbraith <p...@debian.org> writes: > > >> Okay, now I have checked this, because I was also curious, I use the > >> gnus-pers.el stuff only. I just downloaded it and put it to my > >> personal emacs configuration dir and simply purged gnus-bonus-el > >> altogether. Problem solved. :) > > > > I was hoping that you would volunteer to maintain it on alioth. ;-) > > Nah, sorry, I am already overwhelmed with my current packages. I am in > the process of cleaning up, but do not have time for more. > > And also I do not use the other (you say, buggy) stuff, just gnus-pers. > > As you can see from Romain response, the current emacs-snapshot is > tracking emacs24, so he does not want to add an emacs23 provide.
Makes sense. > The problem with depending only on emacsen is that old ones do not > contain gnus at all, do not know what is the correct solution in this > case. Probably providing gnus from emacs23 and emacs-snapshot? Good idea! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
