On Tue, 2010-04-13 at 12:32 -0400, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Apr 2010, Soeren Sonnenburg wrote:
> > On Tue, 2010-04-13 at 11:04 -0400, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
> > > > Any ideas how to fix it? It seems numpy is no better...
> > OK I see, I just did not have this package installed. Now I stil don't
> > know how to create the _d.so's for numpy and I am afraid having multiple
> > packages shogun-dbg, shogun-python-dbg would be misleading. So a
> myself -- I don't care -- they all could reside in the same package if
> you find it easier to do so ;) unless some machinery could have helped
> to automate it (unfortunately cdbs is not yet there)
> 
> > shogun-dbg should contain the _d files for python...
> > If you have time to figure out how this could work - I am all yours :D
> 
> sorry that I wasn't clear:
> > > ... the idea is to
> > > use python*-dbg to build those libraries for -dbg package:
> which is what I was pointing to, but I've forgotten that in shogun you
> don't rely on distutils to build the extensions.... if you did then it
> would be as simple as to use

yeah well shogun is not python only...

> python2.5-dbg setup.py build_ext
> instead of
> python2.5 setup.py build_ext
> 
> in your case, I think it should boil down just to
> 
> 1. disabling optimization in *FLAGS given to gcc
> 2. using /usr/include/python2.5_d instead of /usr/include/python2.5
>    as the path for include files
> 3. -o into _d.so files at the end and install to the corresponding paths
> 
> may be there is smth more to do, but I've not spotted any additional
> actions... could you give this a try?

that seems very hard to do - it is as difficult as getting python
support for 2.4 - 2.6 in the packages. :( 

one basically would need to build libshogun{,ui} first and then using
this libshogun{,ui} build the other interfaces with various settings.
quite a bit of effort I currently don't have time for... 

Soeren
-- 
For the one fact about the future of which we can be certain is that it
will be utterly fantastic. -- Arthur C. Clarke, 1962

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply via email to