[Junichi Uekawa] > > I've attached 2 patches - the first is minimal, the second also > > includes a trivial cleanup I found hard to resist. > > The first one looks fine to me, the second looks intrusive; > care to explain?
The second one just sets $BASENAME to the basename of pwd, since that is used so often in the code. It looks cleaner to only have to call $(basename) once. I thought of that since I was adding yet another $(basename) call. The first patch works, I just thought the second one is nicer code. Peter
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
