Hi,
> So, dpatch-edit-patch produces horrid-looking diff headers:
>
> diff -urNad --exclude=CVS --exclude=.svn ./src/foo.h
> /tmp/dpep-work.XujkX1/foo-1.0/src/foo.h
> --- ./src/foo.h 1996-03-16 10:58:58.000000000 -0600
> +++ /tmp/dpep-work.XujkX1/foo-1.0/src/foo.h 2005-08-04
> 13:39:08.000000000 -0500
>
> These look bad, but also, the /tmp/dpep-work.XujkX1 changes every time
> dpatch-edit-patch runs. So diffing two versions of a patch produces
> lots of noise, for *every* file touched by the patch - even the files I
> did not modify this time. That noise also ends up in the cvs/svn
> commit.
Have you actually tested this?
You may realize that patch command does not preserve timestamps,
and there will always be a diff.
I'm not against making the patch file more beautiful;
but what you want is not completely achieved.
--- debian/patches/02_create_two.dpatch~~ 2005-08-06 15:13:03.796774352
+0900
+++ debian/patches/02_create_two.dpatch 2005-08-06 15:13:04.867611560 +0900
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
@DPATCH@
diff -urNad dpatch-test~/02_create_patch.sh dpatch-test/02_create_patch.sh
--- dpatch-test~/02_create_patch.sh 1970-01-01 09:00:00.000000000 +0900
-+++ dpatch-test/02_create_patch.sh 2005-08-06 15:12:59.000000000 +0900
++++ dpatch-test/02_create_patch.sh 2005-08-06 15:13:04.683639528 +0900
@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
+#!/bin/bash
+##: check generation of initial patch
regards,
junichi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
