While I'm personally not to enthralled about subscriber-only mailing lists, I would have liked to have seen at least a discussion on -project and/or -policy about this before immediately elevating to the CTTE to have it make a decision.[1]
Robert: before we get to far along here, could you tell us about the configuration of pkg-grub-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org? I'm mainly interested in the answers to the following questions, but any additional information or opinion that you have would be nice to hear too. 1) Who is currently allowed to post to pkg-grub-devel? 2) Is there moderation in place for those who are not allowed to post? 3) Would moderation of non-suscribers (or just a rejection of non-negative SA scoring mails) be feasible? I don't think the CTTE should be making a decision just in the case of a single set of packages when this should be something that Debian decides archive-wide. Don Armstrong 1: In fact, if enough other CTTE members feel similarly, I'd propose to require a discussion on -policy or -project first to come up with an appropriate wording change to ยง3.3. -- "For those who understand, no explanation is necessary. For those who do not, none is possible." http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
