Hello,

On antradienis 03 Lapkritis 2009 08:07:05 Rogério Brito wrote:
> On Nov 02 2009, Modestas Vainius wrote:
> > On sekmadienis 01 Lapkritis 2009 19:53:15 Rogério Brito wrote:
> > > Amarok 1.4 in stable is broken because it doesn't show content from
> > > wikipedia about the artists. The only part shown is the list of
> > > languages that the article is translated to, which is, sincerely,
> > > useless.
> >
> > The bug has been reported before. It is fixed in Amarok 2 series.
> 
> Well, actually, as a maintainer of the packages, we should be committed
> also to fix bugs in our stable releases.
> 
> I know that it is tempting to focus on sid and point people there, but
> that's not really something that we should do.

But that's what Debian stable is. You want it to be something different.

It does NOT change which means neither normal bugs are fixed nor new ones are 
introduced. Only bugs of RC (serious, critical, grave, security) severity are 
allowed to be fixed which this one isn't.

> > I'm not convinced I should do stable update for it even if the patch
> > is rather trivial.
> 
> Please, do.

Well, I will think about it (but only due to triviality of the patch it may be 
accepted to stable).

> > There are so many more things broken in Amarok 1 (lastfm, amazon
> > convers...)
> 
> I'm not really sure what problem is related to lastfm, but I'm also
> running here with a patch that takes the covers from last.fm. I can
> submit it, if you wish.

No, I am not interested. I know the situation, the patch would be too 
intrusive.

> And, to be honest, this is one of the perils of having all those
> network-dependent programs: the nature of many resources on the internet
> is ephemeral and such problems will also arise when amarok 2 is in a
> stable release.

Yes. But amarok sole purpose isn't only for accessing those services. That's 
an additional feature so when it brakes, it is not RC bug.

> So, please, do consider a stable update for the loss of functionality
> that amarok has suffered.

Not my call. Wikipedia bug is the only I could practically consider fixing.

-- 
Modestas Vainius <modes...@vainius.eu>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Reply via email to