On Thu, 04 Jun 2009, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > Template: ufw/existing_configuration > Type: error > -_Description: Found existing configuration > - An existing configuration was found. Please use the ufw command to manage > your > - firewall rules. See 'man ufw' for details. > +_Description: Existing configuration found > + An existing configuration file for ufw has been found. > + Existing rules must by adapted manually. > + . > + You should read the ufw(1) manpage for details about ufw configuration. >
Meh, I didn't notice this before, sorry. 'An existing configuration file' is not accurate as this message can be displayed if someone tries to configure ufw via debconf but has configured ufw outside of debconf. There are several files that are checked that will trigger this error. I think this is more accurate: + An existing configuration for ufw has been found. The existing rules + must by managed manually. + . + You should read the ufw(1) manpage for details about ufw configuration. Also I noticed in some of the proposed updates the textwidth is not consistent. Is this intended? I'm rather new to debconf translations-- am I able to change the textwidth without messing up translations? Thanks again for you help on this! :) Jamie -- Jamie Strandboge | http://www.canonical.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
