* Frans Pop [Sat, 06 Dec 2008 23:42:19 +0100]: > http://buildd.debian.org/pkg.cgi?maint=debian-boot%40lists.debian.org
If that page is part of d-i workflow (can you confirm?), then I'm tempted to drop efi-reader from P-a-s/amd64 even if it's not strictly correct to do that. My rationale is, first and foremost, that having spurious red cells on one's roster is really suboptimal; and that -boot really gets to define what spurious means in their roster, because udebs are exclusively for their consumption. (OTOH, I'm pretty sure that if a third party was to go to them with "Hey, I could use efi-reader udeb on amd64", and provided a patch, they'd hopefully include it even if they'd continue not to use efi-reader on amd64.) I'll wait a bit first before going forward to let other wbadm or buildd people express concerns about this exception. Cheers, -- Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org Russian roulette in bash: ((RANDOM%6)) || rm -rf ~ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
