Changwoo Ryu wrote:
* copyright info: freeware program/open source
* source copyright: open source (zlib license)
Very funny. They are conflicting. Surely the author has no idea about
the license matters, or he incorrectly cut-and-pasted from his other
non-free software pages like http://www.kipple.pe.kr/win/nosense/ or
http://www.kipple.pe.kr/win/sudoku/. It looks like a mistake.
OK, It's still not clear. But It does not mean this program is "clearly
non-free".
I'll contact the author myself.
If his webpage is only mistakenly suggesting it is non-free, then good.
However, the source should be improved to have clear copyright and
license notices in all files. Currently the source tarball is awfully
ambiguous. It should be stated explicitly which parts of the work are
under which license.
Warren Togami
wtog...@redhat.com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
