On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 07:02:57AM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > [Kurt Roeckx] > > The reporting of those other states is what this program is designed > > to do. And if it really can't handle those states, I can't agree > > with that severity. > > I must have misunderstood the comment. My understanding was that it > would only crash in some settings and for some users/machine types, > not every time the state was non-normal. If it crashes every time the > state is non-normal, I agree that it is a grave issue, as it make the > package unusable or mostly so. Does it? These are the definitions I > use to decide which severity it deserves:
I can agree to grave. Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
