I will send a patch soon, which does all the changes.

On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 04:37:08PM +0100, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> Package: ndiswrapper
> Version: 1.52-1
> Severity: normal
> 
> ndiswrapper should provide transitional packages for users of ndiswrapper-1.1.
> 
> I would also recommend to drop the wrapper scripts in ndiswrapper-common and
> rename ndiswrapper-utils-1.9 to ndiswrapper-utils.
> 
> There is no reason to have versioned ndiswrapper-utils-.* packages.
> 
> Simply build three transitional binary packages,
> ndiswrapper-utils-1.9, ndiswrapper-utils-1.1, ndiswrapper-common
> which all depend on ndiswrapper-utils.
> 
> Build a real binary package called ndiswrapper-utils which conflicts
> and replaces ndiswrapper-utils-1.9, ndiswrapper-utils-1.1 and 
> ndiswrapper-common.
> 
> 
> -- System Information:
> Debian Release: lenny/sid
>   APT prefers gutsy-updates
>   APT policy: (500, 'gutsy-updates'), (500, 'gutsy-security'), (500, 
> 'gutsy-backports'), (500, 'gutsy'), (1, 'unstable')
> Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
> 
> Kernel: Linux 2.6.24-4-generic (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
> Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
> Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to