Hi Julian, On Sunday 16 March 2008 23:37:57 Julian Andres Klode wrote: > Kel Modderman wrote: > > tags 470774 moreinfo > > thanks > > > > Hi Julian, > > > > On Friday 14 March 2008 01:37:08 Julian Andres Klode wrote: > >> Package: ndiswrapper > >> Version: 1.52-1 > >> Severity: normal > >> > >> ndiswrapper should provide transitional packages for users of > >> ndiswrapper-1.1. > > > > Please explain why. ndiswrapper-utils-1.1 is not required at all since etch, > > and should just be removed from the archive period. > > There are still 800 users according to popcon, these need to be migrated > somehow. They will get no warning that the package has been removed, unless > they > subscribed to the PTS.
What warning do they need? It is true an orphan package may result due to the upgrade path, but do you really think its worth throwing away the protection the ndiswrapper-common wrappers give to clean up that orphan? Or do you think the wrappers serve no purpose? If the purpose of the wrappers isn't yet clear, we should consider approaching Andres for his advice. > > If you think it should just be removed, please explain your position in > Bug#470769. > When we have concluded our discussion here. Thanks, Kel. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
