Hi Barry, > It worked with qpointarray so I didn't try qmemarray. I assume if I had > used the wrong one I would get undefined references?
The point is that qpointarray.h does not only include qmemarray.h, but also another unnecessary include file. If one cares about such changes, the proposed changes should be as minimal as possible. You might want to look into the old headers. Most of them include exactly one of the new headers. It should be straightforward to generate the correct old => new mapping. > I was asked to look in to this on #debian-qa by Sune Vuorela. Those > headers are ooold qt 1.x, 2.x compatibility stuff so anything not > package currently really should be fixed to use qt3/qt4 headers. Getting rid of the libqt3-compat-headers dependency for Debian packages might be a worthy goal, but what about software not packaged for Debian that uses the compatibility headers? > Right now it was just a matter of looking at any packages that depend or > build-depend on libqt3-compat-headers. You might want check with the people that rebuild the archive from time to time in clean chroots whether there are packages that miss a dependency on libqt3-compat-headers. I'm preparing a new revision anyway and will include an adjusted patch. Regards, Joachim -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
