Hi, > We are currently attempting to remove the antiquated libqt3-compat-headers > from the archive. > > Here is a patch to build cgal without libqt3-compat-headers.
thanks for the patch. But shouldn't qarray.h replaced by qmemarray.h instead of qpointarray.h? Is there a particular reason for this attempt (rather than just get rid of one package)? What about software not packaged for Debian that needs these headers? Was there a discussion on some mailing list? BTW how did you find the buggy packages? Did you build them with a fake (empty) qt3-compat-headers package? Just asking because there are some more occurences in the demos (not compiled, just shipped as source in the libcgal-demo package). Joachim -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
