On Wed, Jan 23, 2008 at 07:14:38AM +0100, Dalibor Topic wrote: > Bob Black wrote: >> Will classpath .95 (or .96) be packaged for arm, or is it basically >> armel only going forward? >> >> > It's packaged for arm, but it doesn't build: > > http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=classpath;ver=2%3A0.96.1-1;arch=arm;stamp=1200397843 > > classpath depends on ecj, which depends on gcj, which in turn depends on > ecj to build, and since there is no gcj-4.2 build for arm, the circularity > at the end of the chain is killing the builds. > > One way to unblock it would be to make ecj depend on jamvm alternatively on > arm, I guess.
Quick comment with regard to ecj depending on jamvm alternatively on arm. Jamvm _may_ need to be updated to 1.5 based on something I saw in the 1.5.0 release notes: http://sourceforge.net/project/shownotes.php?release_id=550421 ---- snip ---- - Added symbolic link from lib/rt.jar to Classpath's glibj.zip (fixes programs such as ecj which locates rt.jar via java.home). --- (Though I supposed a minor tweak to the 1.4.5 build could accomplish the same thing.) Bob -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]