Bob Black schrieb:
On Wed, Jan 23, 2008 at 07:14:38AM +0100, Dalibor Topic wrote:
Bob Black wrote:
Will classpath .95 (or .96) be packaged for arm, or is it basically
armel only going forward?
It's packaged for arm, but it doesn't build:
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=classpath;ver=2%3A0.96.1-1;arch=arm;stamp=1200397843
Ah, ok.
classpath depends on ecj, which depends on gcj, which in turn depends on
ecj to build, and since there is no gcj-4.2 build for arm, the circularity
at the end of the chain is killing the builds.
I clicked around packages.debian.org looking at the various deps and
it seemed there were (up to date) arm builds for the ones i looked at.
Looking at gcj-4.2's pool dir (sorted by date):
http://http.us.debian.org/debian/pool/main/g/gcj-4.2/?C=M;O=A
I see various* _arm.deb files dated Jan 18
That's a couple days after the date on the buildd log from above.
Any chance the build just needs to be retried?
That's possible. I've just installed and built classpath on sid arm
manually today using ecj, so it seems to be possible now,
and may just need a friendly nudge to the buildd.
cheers,
dalibor topic
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
