On Wed, Jan 23, 2008 at 07:14:38AM +0100, Dalibor Topic wrote: > Bob Black wrote: >> Will classpath .95 (or .96) be packaged for arm, or is it basically >> armel only going forward? >> >> > It's packaged for arm, but it doesn't build: > > http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=classpath;ver=2%3A0.96.1-1;arch=arm;stamp=1200397843
Ah, ok. > classpath depends on ecj, which depends on gcj, which in turn depends on > ecj to build, and since there is no gcj-4.2 build for arm, the circularity > at the end of the chain is killing the builds. I clicked around packages.debian.org looking at the various deps and it seemed there were (up to date) arm builds for the ones i looked at. Looking at gcj-4.2's pool dir (sorted by date): http://http.us.debian.org/debian/pool/main/g/gcj-4.2/?C=M;O=A I see various* _arm.deb files dated Jan 18 That's a couple days after the date on the buildd log from above. Any chance the build just needs to be retried? > One way to unblock it would be to make ecj depend on jamvm alternatively on > arm, I guess. :) Bob -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
