On Sun, Dec 09, 2007 at 07:44:05AM -0600, Steve M. Robbins wrote: > On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 05:55:29PM +0100, Domenico Andreoli wrote:
> > rebuilding Boost as-is would require a new Boost transition. Could > > we continue to build it with gcc 4.1? At least until 1.35.0 is out, > > that could be a few months away. > On the other hand, gcc default is version 4.2 since September 1. It > would be nice to have boost built with the default gcc. > Couldn't we do the transition now? It took four months to complete the last boost transition. I don't think we need another one of those (ever). Please fix the boost package to *not* encode the compiler version in the library names. (I.e., please maintain compatibility with the binaries currently in the archive.) -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
