On Sun, Dec 09, 2007 at 03:55:31PM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote: > On Sun, Dec 09, 2007 at 01:44:05PM +0000, Steve M. Robbins wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 05:55:29PM +0100, Domenico Andreoli wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > rebuilding Boost as-is would require a new Boost transition. Could > > > we continue to build it with gcc 4.1? At least until 1.35.0 is out, > > > that could be a few months away. > > > > On the other hand, gcc default is version 4.2 since September 1. It > > would be nice to have boost built with the default gcc. > > > > Couldn't we do the transition now? > > I'm sure the RMs are thrilled to go for a new 2 to 3 months long > migration. Couldn't boost be less insane and stop bumping sonames for no > good reasons instead ? I mean what's the point of depending on the gcc > or glibc version, whereas Debian already tracks that down for them.
And well, it's not like having a sane behaviour in Debian would make it less binary incompatible with other distros... Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
