On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 09:21:36AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 05:55:29PM +0100, Domenico Andreoli wrote:
> 
> >   rebuilding Boost as-is would require a new Boost transition.
> 
> Why would that be?  gcc-4.1 and gcc-4.2 are supposed to be fully
> ABI-compatible.

Bacause library names encode gcc version.

-----[ Domenico Andreoli, aka cavok
 --[ http://www.dandreoli.com/gpgkey.asc
   ---[ 3A0F 2F80 F79C 678A 8936  4FEE 0677 9033 A20E BC50



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to