On Thu, 29 Mar 2007 16:01:21 -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 03:42:14PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Since I do not think that UTF-8 is broken, I am unlikely to
> You are entitled to your own opinion. I prefer to let mine be guided
> by casual and careful empiricism.
> And the fact remains that the enforeced switch to UTF-8 turned a
> *working* piece of infrastructure into a *broken* one.
It was not actually working. mailcrypt created something, and
then emacs went and was free to mangle it -- which means it is broken
for any message body that has anything that is non ascii. In this
day and age, that is broken.
Updating to easypg should be on your todo list.
> Again, see lwn.net. Evidently I am not the only being bitten by
> this.
Lots of people have broken MUAs. That is their problem.
I suggest you strive to enter this millennium. Being a Luddite
in a technology project gets old real fast.
manoj
--
People usually get what's coming to them ... unless it's been mailed.
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
