* Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061117 11:52]: > On Fri, Nov 17, 2006 at 09:15:44AM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote: > > > > > When upgrading a 2.4 system, kernel first. It's also the easiest > > > > component > > > > part to rollback. > > > > Kernel first before what? Before anything else in userspace? > > > Upgrading the kernel means to upgrade udev and also glibc. This is > > entirly possible. > > > We have one problematic case, though: Upgrades from 2.2 to 2.6 on an > > arch without 2.4-kernels. Do we need udev-backports for them? > > The only arch with 2.2 kernels in sarge is m68k though, which isn't > releasing with etch. The m68k porters should surely be consulted about how > they want to handle this.
I know of at least one powerpc-subarchitecture that has no 2.4 kernels. I need to check whether they have working 2.6 kernels in sarge, or not. Cheers, Andi -- http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
