Hello, On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 07:49:18PM +0200, Helge Kreutzmann wrote: > > While translating, I noticed the following possible improvements for the man > page:
I applied most of them. The missing or ignored items are: > Debian policy distinguishes between configuration files and conffiles. In the > man page, however, the following is written: > "configuration files. This may avoid having to reconfigure the package if it " > "is reinstalled later. (Configuration files are the files listed in the " > "I<debian/conffiles> control file). B<-P> or B<--purge> removes everything, " > Is this correct? I think conffiles are meant here? Maybe check the entire man > page for other occurences of this (missing) difference. > -"error: extend-error-message'. Configuration file conflicts are reported as > " > +"error: extend-error-message'. Conffile conflicts are reported as " I will have to turn my brain on to fix these. > Well, I don't know the current CD layout, but is it sensible to still cite > hamm? > " B<cd /cdrom/hamm/hamm/binary/editors>\n" > I started with late potato, so it definitly predates my Debian experience > ;-) I will have to find a CD. On the other hand, the example is clear enought, even if the directory hierarchy do not match actual CDs. > Sometimes dpkg is written in plain text, sometimes in bold (i.e. B<dpkg>). Is > there a "hidden" scheme behind this? Otherwise this should be unified. I don't think there's a rationnal for dpkg in bold or regular font. After a quick look, I could find 2 of these, and fixed them. I dont't think it's worth fixing all the manpages this way. Thanks again for your proposals (and for the German translations), A new version of the PO is attached. Kind Regards, -- Nekral
dpkg_de.po.bz2
Description: Binary data
