Le jeudi 02 octobre 2025 à 00:23 +0200, Vincent Lefevre a écrit : > Source: hunspell-fr > Version: 1:7.0-3 > Severity: normal > > The 3 .dic dictionaries contain > > piétonisation/S.() po:nom is:fem > > as seen with > > $ grep piéton *.dic > fr-classique.dic:piéton/F+() po:nom po:adj > fr-classique.dic:piétonisation/S.() po:nom is:fem > fr-classique.dic:piétonnier/F.() po:nom > fr-classique.dic:piétonniser/a0p+() po:v1_it____a > fr-reforme1990.dic:piéton/F+() po:nom po:adj > fr-reforme1990.dic:piétonisation/S.() po:nom is:fem > fr-reforme1990.dic:piétonnier/F.() po:nom > fr-reforme1990.dic:piétonniser/a0p+() po:v1_it____a > fr-toutesvariantes.dic:piéton/F+() po:nom po:adj > fr-toutesvariantes.dic:piétonisation/S.() po:nom is:fem > fr-toutesvariantes.dic:piétonnier/F.() po:nom > fr-toutesvariantes.dic:piétonniser/a0p+() po:v1_it____a > > This is incorrect. The correct spelling is "piétonnisation" > (with 2 "n"): > > https://www.larousse.fr/dictionnaires/francais/pi%C3%A9tonnisation/186622 > https://dictionnaire.lerobert.com/definition/pietonnisation
It seems that both forms exist, though the one with two “n” is indeed more frequent: https://fr.wiktionary.org/wiki/pi%C3%A9tonisation -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Sébastien Villemot ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Debian Developer ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ https://sebastien.villemot.name ⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀ https://www.debian.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
