-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On Fri, 2025-07-18 at 15:27 +0100, Peter Blackman wrote:
> Yet another choice!
> (Switching to #1090384)

Thanks :)
> 
> FWIW I did a little survey on what the other distributions are doing;
> 
> Arch        polkit-gnome
> Fedora      xfce-polkit
> Mageia      mate-polkit
> Mandriva    xfce-polkit
> SuSE        polkit-gnome

And thanks for that survey.

polkit-gnome is what I currently use (I have policykit-1-gnome installed) but
I understand that it's going away so it's not a good candidate.

If xfce-polkit was actually maintained upstream and integrated under the Xfce
project umbrella it would make a lot of sense (even though it's a bit of a
duplicate with mate-polkit).

> 
> 
> I don't now think that me attempting an MR for this bug (when opinions
> differ as to what that should contain) is likely to help, and will just 
> slow things down.

Yeah agreed, you might just lose your time and burn yourself out.
> 
> Any dependency would solve the issue of users ending up with no 
> authentication agent. Choices have little downside,
> as the agents don't do anything unless enabled,
> and users having issues can always install something else.

At that point I'm likely to use:
Recommends: mate-polkit | polkit-1-auth-agent

That way mate-polkit will be installed by default if no other agent is
installed. That still means people already having another desktop installed
might not get a running agent (because of the OnlyShowIn part, especially
since packages with Provides: polkit-1-auth-agent include gnome-shell or
cinnamon) but I think I'm ok with that. Besides this bug I don't have the
feeling that a lot of people are actually missing a polkit agent (we're not
flooded with report, contrary to other bugs).

Regards,
- -- 
Yves-Alexis
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEE8vi34Qgfo83x35gF3rYcyPpXRFsFAmh6XysACgkQ3rYcyPpX
RFuo+AgAxd2CGgNTA3ytKsonc3bfnkSzhMMc6iXubvXYL71LGP5CUhZHqCqKdqKR
9sXJk3pbIjBfEck/QVQUDRjySr0O3VkRhJW4CCE77ZthzmVq/rLaUJBJDYDB1FQF
9IdyxyVOyAHBVc/VyeABgz0+QNsh55Y+QKh+Y+XDJ0JRJse54FLglH2QDLv9LO3n
w8BXuqB90D7S6gAqWiFqRyH0oThWo+TeRp2z3JMBYzHMVklyDctHf90nZUQlkuoB
Yrqzxeib1GrfsCHJb0q2kG0qDz24pAMpX1nbo84Jh9Q4Cqlo/Fn46xr5EcgYPIyR
vXk8P9RkNtRt8l2zj+Amvbe0HVtvSw==
=qAMB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to