On Mon, 17 Jun 2024 18:33:46 +0200 Andreas Metzler <ametz...@bebt.de> wrote: > On 2024-06-17 Ingo Klöcker <kloec...@kde.org> wrote: > > The idea is to keep the include files identical, but to make things > > easier we will install the headers for Qt 5 and Qt 6 with different > > prefixes in the next version of gpgme (https://dev.gnupg.org/T7161). > > Doesn't this break all reverse dependencies?
What reverse dependencies? Packages depending on qgpgme will automatically find the headers in the new location if they use the CMake config files that come with qgpgme to find qgpgme. > As a packager I currently do not see the need (or a benefit) to use > separate directories if the files are going to stay identical. Am I > missing something? One benefit is that packagers don't have to wonder anymore whether the headers are/stay identical. We wouldn't even have this conversation if we had used separate folders since we added support for Qt 6. Regards, Ingo
