On 2024-06-17 Ingo Klöcker <kloec...@kde.org> wrote: > On Sun, 16 Jun 2024 18:35:03 +0200 Andreas Metzler <ametz...@bebt.de> wrote: >> I have chosen to use separate, conflicting qt5/qt6 development packages. >> This is the ultra-conservative approach but I am not sure it is the >> best/right one. Currently all common files in the two dev-packages are >> bit-for-bit identical (/usr/include) so it would be possible to merge >> these now. I just do not know whether they will stay that way. I will also >> ask upstream.
> The idea is to keep the include files identical, but to make things > easier we will install the headers for Qt 5 and Qt 6 with different > prefixes in the next version of gpgme (https://dev.gnupg.org/T7161). Hello, Doesn't this break all reverse dependencies? As a packager I currently do not see the need (or a benefit) to use separate directories if the files are going to stay identical. Am I missing something? (I would simply move away from the above mentioned ultra-conservative approach and save complexity and archive space.) cu Andreas -- `What a good friend you are to him, Dr. Maturin. His other friends are so grateful to you.' `I sew his ears on from time to time, sure'
