On 2024-06-16 Andreas Metzler <ametz...@bebt.de> wrote: > On 2024-06-15 Patrick Franz <delta...@debian.org> wrote: [...] >> Currently, gpgme offers Qt 5 bindings, but for Plasma 6 we will need the >> Qt 6 bindings for gpgme. Is it possible to add them ?
> 1.19.0 added "Optionally, build QGpgME for Qt 6". Which > afaict gives the same header files but a soname of libqgpgmeqt6.so.15 > instead of libqgpgme.so.15. Hello, I have packaged 1.23.2 (TODO: debian/copyright update) and have added a first draft of packaging QT 6 bindings. https://salsa.debian.org/debian/gpgme/-/commits/tmp-ametz-debian%2Fexperimental?ref_type=heads (There is a corresponding also ff-able tmp-ametz-upstream branch.) I started with splitting of the QT5 parts as libqgpgme-dev from libgpgme-dev (unfuzzed patch by Rene Engelhard on #863149) and added libqgpgmeqt6-15 / libqgpgmeqt6-dev. This requires building gpgme twice in a row since qt5 and qt6 cannot be enabled together. I have chosen to use separate, conflicting qt5/qt6 development packages. This is the ultra-conservative approach but I am not sure it is the best/right one. Currently all common files in the two dev-packages are bit-for-bit identical (/usr/include) so it would be possible to merge these now. I just do not know whether they will stay that way. I will also ask upstream. cu Andreas
