That's a little bit of a separate concern from what I was talking about (Moby own versions vs code dependencies).
In short, no, the upstream project does not currently have any "LTS" branches (and never really had anything *super* long term outside of the enterprise edition that wasn't open source -- the longest I recall on the open source side was somewhere around four months). The closest thing upstream to LTS right now is probably the 23.x branch/release line where Mirantis is maintaining their currently supported version with the support/assistance/blessing of the upstream community. AFAIK, the 24.x branch is effectively already EOL. (There's a task item on the project's list to document all this publicly better, but it's definitely challenging, as I'm sure you can imagine/understand.) ♥, - Tianon 4096R / B42F 6819 007F 00F8 8E36 4FD4 036A 9C25 BF35 7DD4 On Fri, 17 May 2024 at 00:37, Shengjing Zhu <z...@debian.org> wrote: > Hi Tianon, > > Actually I'm lost with the upstream version policy after they changed > the schema. Is there still something called "LTS"? > > -- > Shengjing Zhu >
