On Fri, May 17, 2024 at 3:06 PM Tianon Gravi <tia...@debian.org> wrote:
> That's a little bit of a separate concern from what I was talking about
> (Moby own versions vs code dependencies).
>
> In short, no, the upstream project does not currently have any "LTS"
> branches (and never really had anything *super* long term outside of the
> enterprise edition that wasn't open source -- the longest I recall on the
> open source side was somewhere around four months).
>
> The closest thing upstream to LTS right now is probably the 23.x
> branch/release line where Mirantis is maintaining their currently supported
> version with the support/assistance/blessing of the upstream community.
>
> AFAIK, the 24.x branch is effectively already EOL.
>
>
Just to clarify and for the avoidance of doubt, I picked 24.0.9 because I
understand this is the version that is supposed to work with the version of
containerd we currently have in unstable. Obviously packaging supported
versions of docker/containerd is preferable, but since this is already a
daunting task, I opted for this older version to not make the task
more complicated than it needs to be.
--
regards,
Reinhard
