On Fri, Jun 02, 2006 at 06:50:07PM -0300, Gustavo Franco wrote: > Steve Langasek wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 02, 2006 at 05:38:05PM -0300, Gustavo Franco wrote:
> >> AFAIK, this bug was fixed since libgnome-cil isn't using the old > >> gtkhtml3.6 anymore, it's now depending on gtkhtml3.8. Could you > >> confirm ? > > That wouldn't cause this to cease to be a bug in gtkhtml3.6, it would just > > mean that the bug in gtkhtml3.6 no longer affects particular packages which > > don't depend on it. > Sure, i shouldn't use the word 'fixed'. I just wanted to point out for bug > squashers, that this bug doesn't need a new gtkhtml3.6 upload after the > submitter ack'ed that gtkhtml3.8 fixes the problem. Ok, just wanted to be clear that this wasn't "fixed" as in "bug should be closed". :) > > Anyway, gtk-sharp2 in testing still depends on gtkhtml3.6, as does gtk-sharp > > (libgnome-cil) on arm (because it's out of date). I think the right fix is > > to drop gtkhtml3.6 in favor of gtkhtml3.8, but this is not possible yet due > > to the reverse dependencies. It could be removed from unstable at the > > maintainer's request, though... > AFAIK, it isn't not possible yet due to peacock (#359114) and probably > outdated > stuff in some archs (arm?). The plan is ship only one gtkhtml3.x in Etch, yes. > We've started this transition some time ago, and i'm waiting only Noèl. Well, I suggest 359114 should be treated as release-critical, and a removal request should be filed for gtkhtml3.6 whether or not peacock has transitioned yet. There's more work to be done before gtkhtml3.6 can be dropped from etch, of course, since gtk-sharp2 waits on gnome-panel, evolution-data-server, avahi, and qt4-x11... -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
