Steve Langasek wrote: > On Fri, Jun 02, 2006 at 05:38:05PM -0300, Gustavo Franco wrote: > >> AFAIK, this bug was fixed since libgnome-cil isn't using the old >> gtkhtml3.6 anymore, it's now depending on gtkhtml3.8. Could you >> confirm ? > > That wouldn't cause this to cease to be a bug in gtkhtml3.6, it would just > mean that the bug in gtkhtml3.6 no longer affects particular packages which > don't depend on it.
Sure, i shouldn't use the word 'fixed'. I just wanted to point out for bug squashers, that this bug doesn't need a new gtkhtml3.6 upload after the submitter ack'ed that gtkhtml3.8 fixes the problem. > Anyway, gtk-sharp2 in testing still depends on gtkhtml3.6, as does gtk-sharp > (libgnome-cil) on arm (because it's out of date). I think the right fix is > to drop gtkhtml3.6 in favor of gtkhtml3.8, but this is not possible yet due > to the reverse dependencies. It could be removed from unstable at the > maintainer's request, though... AFAIK, it isn't not possible yet due to peacock (#359114) and probably outdated stuff in some archs (arm?). The plan is ship only one gtkhtml3.x in Etch, yes. We've started this transition some time ago, and i'm waiting only Noèl. regards, Gustavo Franco - <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
