Hi Hilmar, On Tue, May 30, 2023 at 05:25:33PM +0200, Preuße, Hilmar wrote: > On 28.05.2023 20:52, Philippe SWARTVAGHER wrote: > > Hello, > > > (not sure if this bug report should be against texlive-luatex or > > texlive-binaries...) > > > > I upgraded texlive-binaries (and other related packages) from > > 2018.20181218.49446-1 to 2018.20181218.49446-1+deb10u1 on a Debian > > Buster. Since then, I cannot use lualatex because of an error. > > > When texlive-luatex is not installed luaotfload complains, but compiling > does not fail. > > hille@ssoitbmtest:~$ lualatex test.tex > This is LuaTeX, Version 1.07.0 (TeX Live 2019/dev/Debian) > restricted system commands enabled. > (./test.tex > LaTeX2e <2018-12-01> > [\directlua]:1: module 'luaotfload-main' not found: > no field package.preload['luaotfload-main'] > [kpse lua searcher] file not found: 'luaotfload-main' > [kpse C searcher] file not found: 'luaotfload-main' > Error in luaotfload: reverting to OT1 > > > > Some remarks: > > - it works as expected with version 2018.20181218.49446-1 (tested by > > removing > > buster/updates from sources.list) > > > Did not confirm, but I guess we would have seen that report earlier, if -1 > would be affected. > > > - it works as expected as long as I don't install texlive-luatex > > > Confirmed. > > > - I didn't test with Debian stable / testing / unstable > > > Works fine for stable and testing, so only oldstable (the upcoming > oldoldstable) is affected.
First I'm relieved to hear it does not affect stable and newer. > @Salvatore: I'll try to forward that issue to upstream. Will there be > further point released for buster? No, buster is under LTS support which does not have point releases. But as I understand this is a regression from DLA DLA-3427-1, so a regression update might be worth to be issues for it, once there is a fix known. Thus might need to loop in debian-lts list and/or Markus as well. Does this helps you already for the admnistrativa part? Regards, Salvatore
