Hi Chris,
Chris Lamb wrote:
> > This lintian tag should be:
> >
> > a) downgraded from "Severity: normal" level to either "Severity:
> > wishlist" or even "Severity: pedantic", and
> >
> > b) changed from "Certainty: certain" to "Certainty: wild-guess" as
> > there are clearly multiple and common cases where the switch to
> > dh-elpa is impossible as of now.
> >
> > Alternatively, the tag should be changed to be only emitted if the
> > binary package is named either elpa-*, *-el or *-mode
>
> This sounds the most sensible way forward, ie. fixing most of the false-
> positives, rather than just making Lintian very slightly less noisy.
Please note that I'm not 100% sure if these wildcards would match all
relevant packages for now. Looking into the dh_elpa source code again
might reveal some better metrics. Maybe also David Bremner (reincluded
in Cc) might have some more insight with which packages dh-elpa works
and with which it doesn't.
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Beckert <a...@debian.org>, https://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
`. `' | 4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329 6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5
`- | 1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486 202E C09E 1D89 9593 0EDE
