Hi,
Nicholas D Steeves wrote:
> > I had to patch tpp-mode.el slightly as the headers and footers didn't
> > seem in the proper format either.
>
> Mm, it might also be the case that tpp-mode.el and verbiste.el are
> missing something that is essential to an ELPA package's (packages.el)
> form.
Might be, yes. Then again, this is something which dh_elpa does based
on Debian package names, so I somehow doubt that there will be an elpa
header field stating into which Debian package the description file
will go. ;-)
> P.S. I'm not sure if it's a hard requirement or the standard
> convention, but usually debian/control will produce a bin:package
> named elpa-tpp-mode,
If that's a requirement, I'd consider that to be the bug.
There surely always will be packages where an emacs mode is just a
tiny give-away to some bigger package. At least from my point of view,
a separate binary package just for tpp's emacs-mode doesn't make
sense.
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Beckert <a...@debian.org>, https://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
`. `' | 4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329 6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5
`- | 1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486 202E C09E 1D89 9593 0EDE
