Hello Michael, Michael Biebl [2018-03-08 12:16 +0100]: > Am 08.03.2018 um 09:22 schrieb Martin Pitt: > There is one case: someone installs a minimal system without > libpam-systemd, then switches to sysvinit-core, then installs a desktop > environment which pulls libpam-systemd (via polkit in most cases). In > that specific scenario, apt will uninstall sysvinit-core and install > systemd-sysv again.
Good point. The same in the other direction (install minimal system, then a desktop which pulls in libpam-systemd) ought to be satisfied with the already installed systemd-sysv, so that should work (modulo apt getting confused). > Is this something the TC has considered and is ok with? I don't think they considered this at all. They simply said that there is no longer an ordering requirement from their side, and it's back to us maintainer's consideration. Martin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
