On Thu, 8 Mar 2018 12:47:22 +0100 Martin Pitt <mp...@debian.org> wrote: > Hello Michael, > > Michael Biebl [2018-03-08 12:16 +0100]: > > Am 08.03.2018 um 09:22 schrieb Martin Pitt: > > There is one case: someone installs a minimal system without > > libpam-systemd, then switches to sysvinit-core, then installs a desktop > > environment which pulls libpam-systemd (via polkit in most cases). In > > that specific scenario, apt will uninstall sysvinit-core and install > > systemd-sysv again. > > Good point. The same in the other direction (install minimal system, then a > desktop which pulls in libpam-systemd) ought to be satisfied with the already > installed systemd-sysv, so that should work (modulo apt getting confused). > > > Is this something the TC has considered and is ok with? > > I don't think they considered this at all. They simply said that there is no > longer an ordering requirement from their side, and it's back to us > maintainer's consideration.
So, what are we going to do now then? -- Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the universe are pointed away from Earth?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
