On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 05:02:45PM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: > On 10/08/15 16:57, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > > On 2015-08-10 15:52, Simon McVittie wrote: > >> On 10/08/15 13:35, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > >>> Yes, provided that an upload to unstable with a higher version number > >>> happens before or ASAP afterwards please. > >> > >> iceweasel/38.1.1esr-1 is already in unstable, which is why I suggested > >> iceweasel/38.1.1esr-1~deb9u1 for t-p-u. > >> > >> S > > > > Ah, apologies. In that case please go ahead. > > I am not the maintainer, just an interested user suggesting a way for > this security fix to bypass the g++-5 transition (and the X-Debbugs-Cc > to the maintainers seems to have got lost). > > iceweasel maintainers: if you want to do a t-p-u upload of an iceweasel > built in stretch to bypass the g++-5 transition, the release team say > that's OK (see #795079 for full details). > > If you don't intend to do that upload, would you like me to do so as an > NMU? (Disclaimer: I know nothing about iceweasel internals, so I would > just be "turning the handle" on a no-changes rebuild.)
Please feel free to do so. I don't have a build environment for testing. You don't need anything more than a null changelog entry with a version bump. Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
