Norbert Preining <prein...@logic.at> writes: > Hi again > > not recommended but didn't wanted to > create multiple commits of related changes. > > > ok, not my favorite but probably ok for debian-fonts policy.
Well there isn't any policy, I do this because I generate changelog from git dch command and do minimal editing. > > > > > But actually, we are renaming conffile in -6 so this should be -6~ > right?. I re-read that paragraph > > "For example, for a conffile removed in version 2.0-1 of a > package, > prior-version should be set to 2.0-1~." > > We are droping -6 so it should be -6~ right? Or am I confusing it > with > something else?. > > > No laptop at hand, but I faintly remember that we are preparing > version -5? The changelog said unreleased for -5, so we are (re)moving > the confdiles in version -5 and upward. > > But I might be wrong, it is 6:30 in the morning ;-) Well there was a mistake in changelog, it was uploaded by non team member last time so git was not updated. I noticed this when I started working on this bug and updated changelog entry for -5 as unstable. So -6 is the actual to be released version. I guess this clarifies the doubt regarding prior-version in maintscript. -- Vasudev Kamath http://copyninja.info Connect on ~friendica: copyni...@samsargika.copyninja.info IRC nick: copyninja | vasudev {irc.oftc.net | irc.freenode.net} GPG Key: C517 C25D E408 759D 98A4 C96B 6C8F 74AE 8770 0B7E
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
