Norbert Preining <prein...@logic.at> writes: > On Sun, 28 Dec 2014, Vasudev Kamath wrote: >> I've prepared the package and updated maintscript file to handle now >> obsolete 65-droid-sans-fallback.conf file removal. > > But I have added this already, shouldn't it be > mv_conffile > instead of rm_conffile and adding a new? Otherwise changes in the > conffile might get lost? > > I mean, I am fine with this procedure and requiring admins to carry over > changes manually, as the probability of having a changes in this file > is *rather* low. > > I just wanted to ask. The current way is for sure easier ;-)
Oh hrm.. To be frank I'm unsure when mv_conffile is used, confusion originates because we are installing 69-droid-sans-fallback.conf. So I thought removing old config is correct. But thinking again you are right we might loose changes if I do rm_conffile. So I will fix this to use mv_conffile. Thanks and Regards -- Vasudev Kamath http://copyninja.info Connect on ~friendica: copyni...@samsargika.copyninja.info IRC nick: copyninja | vasudev {irc.oftc.net | irc.freenode.net} GPG Key: C517 C25D E408 759D 98A4 C96B 6C8F 74AE 8770 0B7E
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
