Hello, On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 11:53:39PM +0200, Roland Stigge wrote: > On 11/06/13 20:47, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > >> Adding the respective build-deps and deps via debian/control, as done in > >> the > >> powerpc case, fixes the issue. > > Not sure I understand you correctly. Do you mean something like: > > > > diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control > > index 3a7a9f1..4b48f31 100644 > > --- a/debian/control > > +++ b/debian/control > > @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ Section: misc > > Priority: extra > > Maintainer: Uwe Kleine-König <u...@kleine-koenig.org> > > Standards-Version: 3.9.3 > > -Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 9), libnuma-dev (>= 2.0.3) [amd64 i386 ia64 > > mips mipsel powerpc], dkms (>= 2.1.0.0) > > +Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 9), libnuma-dev (>= 2.0.3) [amd64 i386 ia64 > > mips mipsel powerpc powerpcspe], dkms (>= 2.1.0.0) > > Vcs-Browser: http://git.pengutronix.de/?p=ukl/rt-tests.git; > > Vcs-Git: git://git.pengutronix.de/git/ukl/rt-tests.git > > Also consider the (binary package's) dep on libnuma1, further below in > debian/control. The binary's dependency is autogenerated, so that doesn't need intervention.
> > Reading the output of $(apt-cache showsrc numactl) makes me believe that > > this would make the build-depends unfulfillable on powerpcspe. > > numactl 2.0.8-2 (just fresh into unstable) is available on powerpcspe. ok. > > > What does gcc -dumpmachine and uname -m say on powerpcspe? > > powerpc-linux-gnuspe > ppc thanks. > > And it seems x32 and maybe ppc64 are affected, too. > > Right. hmm, so we have to find out if numactl could be built for x32 and ppc64, too. /me will try. Best regards Uwe -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
