On 11/06/13 20:47, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: >> Adding the respective build-deps and deps via debian/control, as done in the >> powerpc case, fixes the issue. > Not sure I understand you correctly. Do you mean something like: > > diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control > index 3a7a9f1..4b48f31 100644 > --- a/debian/control > +++ b/debian/control > @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ Section: misc > Priority: extra > Maintainer: Uwe Kleine-König <u...@kleine-koenig.org> > Standards-Version: 3.9.3 > -Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 9), libnuma-dev (>= 2.0.3) [amd64 i386 ia64 > mips mipsel powerpc], dkms (>= 2.1.0.0) > +Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 9), libnuma-dev (>= 2.0.3) [amd64 i386 ia64 > mips mipsel powerpc powerpcspe], dkms (>= 2.1.0.0) > Vcs-Browser: http://git.pengutronix.de/?p=ukl/rt-tests.git; > Vcs-Git: git://git.pengutronix.de/git/ukl/rt-tests.git
Also consider the (binary package's) dep on libnuma1, further below in debian/control. > Reading the output of $(apt-cache showsrc numactl) makes me believe that > this would make the build-depends unfulfillable on powerpcspe. numactl 2.0.8-2 (just fresh into unstable) is available on powerpcspe. > What does gcc -dumpmachine and uname -m say on powerpcspe? powerpc-linux-gnuspe ppc > And it seems x32 and maybe ppc64 are affected, too. Right. bye, Roland -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
