found 711952 0.84-1
quit

Hello,

On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 02:54:50PM +0200, Roland Stigge wrote:
> Source: rt-tests
> Version: 0.84-2
> Severity: wishlist
> Tags: patch sid
> User: debian-powerpc...@breakpoint.cc
> Usertags: powerpcspe
> 
> Hi,
> 
> rt-tests FTBFS on powerpcspe[1] like this:
> 
> [...]
> 
> Adding the respective build-deps and deps via debian/control, as done in the
> powerpc case, fixes the issue.
Not sure I understand you correctly. Do you mean something like:

diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control
index 3a7a9f1..4b48f31 100644
--- a/debian/control
+++ b/debian/control
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ Section: misc
 Priority: extra
 Maintainer: Uwe Kleine-König <u...@kleine-koenig.org>
 Standards-Version: 3.9.3
-Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 9), libnuma-dev (>= 2.0.3) [amd64 i386 ia64 mips 
mipsel powerpc], dkms (>= 2.1.0.0)
+Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 9), libnuma-dev (>= 2.0.3) [amd64 i386 ia64 mips 
mipsel powerpc powerpcspe], dkms (>= 2.1.0.0)
 Vcs-Browser: http://git.pengutronix.de/?p=ukl/rt-tests.git;
 Vcs-Git: git://git.pengutronix.de/git/ukl/rt-tests.git
 
Reading the output of $(apt-cache showsrc numactl) makes me believe that
this would make the build-depends unfulfillable on powerpcspe.

What does gcc -dumpmachine and uname -m say on powerpcspe?

And it seems x32 and maybe ppc64 are affected, too.

Best regards
Uwe


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to