On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 04:47:03PM -0400, Christian Hammers wrote: > That sounds reasonable. > > Maybe upstream started to put proper versions on the library by then. > Because else people will file RC bugs if upstream changes the ABI and > I still ship it as .so.0.0.0. Alternatively I could put the shared > library into a -dev package to clarify its intend but that surely also > violates the policy :)
Well since I think the shared library is used by quagga, it can't go in -dev. The headers and static library though isn't used by quagga and could go in -dev (and should). Whether to split the shared library into a seperate libquagga is the big question. -- Len Sorensen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
