Am Mon, 15 Apr 2013 11:55:33 -0400 schrieb Len Sorensen <lennartsoren...@ruggedcom.com>: ...
> > It would be nice to have quagga package cleanup and split into > > quagga, libquagga0 and libquagga-dev[*], but this hardly qualifies > > as RC bug. > > Oh are policy bugs RC? I do think this qualifies as violating the > policy, and also being not a nice thing. I don't think it should > hold up the release though. I would love to see it fixed for the > next release after that though. That sounds reasonable. Maybe upstream started to put proper versions on the library by then. Because else people will file RC bugs if upstream changes the ABI and I still ship it as .so.0.0.0. Alternatively I could put the shared library into a -dev package to clarify its intend but that surely also violates the policy :) bye, -christian- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
