On Fri, 2012-12-28 at 20:47 -0500, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
> On Sat, 29 Dec 2012, Gedalya wrote:
>
> > How so? Everyone following testing had -2 up until now, not -6. How is this
> > going to go away in terms of upgrading existing installations?
>
> To be honest the main upgrades we cae about are squeeze -> wheezy and
> squeeze doesn't have 2.x.
>
> Testing/unstable users are asked for forgiveness for occasionally being
> used as guinea pigs though we certainly try to avoid breakage as much as
> possible.
And I do use my own personal mail server as a guinea pig before ever
upgrading packages on production servers, so this deal does work out in
the end... :-)
>
> > I have a suggestion, tell me if this makes any sense:
> > In preinst, Search the existing config for a namespace inbox {} entry, and
> > if
> > none exists and no 15-mailboxes.conf file exists, create one containing an
> > informative comment. This should draw the user's attention to the right
> > places at the right time during ucf. Basically the user will be prompted
> > about updating a 15-mailboxes.conf rather than just dumping a new one which
> > silently and unintuitively makes the server unusable.
>
> What you say makes sense but we are in a freeze so I can't make big
> changes like that. The real mistake was not including 15-mailboxes.conf
> in the first place.
>
OK gotcha, at least I know I didn't sound like an idiot :D
Thanks!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
