tags 696659 + pending thanks Hey Moritz,
I've pushed a fix in git. If you wouldn't mind reviewing the diff[1] and ensuring that it satisfies your concerns, that would be great. High level logic is, given a exec problem (dput.utils:95), and the file we're s'posed to run isn't on the filesystem, duck the error and complain to the user, but allow the upload. Arno, can you ACK this change? On Tue, Dec 25, 2012 at 06:08:10PM +0100, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: > > > > Please keep in mind all old dput configs will override new dput configs > > > > -- we defer to the old configs in all cases :) > > > > > > > > If it's still saying to run that hook, dput-ng will try to run the hook. > > > > > > > > Perhaps remove that target? > > > > > > I will remove /etc/dput.cf, then. I can't remember to have made any > > > special > > > modifications to the config, so the dput-ng default config should probably > > > suit me. > > > > Hopefully :) > > > > If there are additinal targets, I can make sure that it gets added, or > > help you add a new target. > > Thanks for the quick followup and on working towards a more actively > maintained > upload tool! It's my pleasure, truely! > > I'll try another upload using dput-ng when the next security update is ready. Sounds fantastic. > > Cheers, > Moritz Cheers, Paul [1]: http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/dputng.git;a=commitdiff;h=a57cfd6d5eb7bb1e4166eafb72cb434f0614f7d0 -- .''`. Paul Tagliamonte <paul...@debian.org> : :' : Proud Debian Developer `. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87 `- http://people.debian.org/~paultag
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
