I tried with libexif 0.6.20-2, same result:
strace -e open chromium-browser 2>&1 | grep icon-theme.cache | grep -v
ENOENT
open("/usr/share/icons/gnome/icon-theme.cache", O_RDONLY|O_LARGEFILE) = 62
open("/usr/share/icons/gnome/icon-theme.cache", O_RDONLY|O_LARGEFILE) = 63
open("/usr/share/icons/hicolor/icon-theme.cache", O_RDONLY|O_LARGEFILE) = 62
open("/usr/share/icons/hicolor/icon-theme.cache", O_RDONLY|O_LARGEFILE) = 63
zsh: segmentation fault strace -e open chromium-browser 2>&1 |
zsh: done grep icon-theme.cache | grep -v ENOENT
Eugenio
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 3:25 PM, Eugenio Cano-Manuel Mendoza <
eugenioca...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> chromium-browser did not start with the -f option for some reason...
> however I managed to reproduce the segfault and this is the trace:
>
>
> strace -e open chromium-browser 2>&1 | grep icon-theme.cache | grep -v
> ENOENT
> open("/usr/share/icons/gnome/icon-theme.cache", O_RDONLY|O_LARGEFILE) = 68
> open("/usr/share/icons/gnome/icon-theme.cache", O_RDONLY|O_LARGEFILE) = 69
> open("/usr/share/icons/hicolor/icon-theme.cache", O_RDONLY|O_LARGEFILE) =
> 68
> open("/usr/share/icons/hicolor/icon-theme.cache", O_RDONLY|O_LARGEFILE) =
> 69
> zsh: segmentation fault strace -e open chromium-browser 2>&1 |
> zsh: done grep icon-theme.cache | grep -v ENOENT
>
> I have to mention that I ran this using libexif 0.6.20-3, I'll try with
> 0.6.20-2 soon.
>
> Cheers,
> Eugenio
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 3:43 AM, Jonathan Nieder <jrnie...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Emmanuel Bouthenot wrote:
>>
>> > I'll be glad if the people able to reproduce this bug could attach to
>> > this bug report the result of the following command:
>> >
>> > # strace -e open chromium-browser 2>&1|grep icon-theme.cache|grep -v
>> ENOENT
>>
>> /usr/bin/chromium-browser is a shell script, so presumably you'll
>> rather want output from
>>
>> strace -f -e open chromium-browser --single-process 2>&1 |
>> grep icon-theme.cache |
>> grep -v ENOENT
>>
>> Hans, Eugenio, is this reproducible with --single-process?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Jonathan
>>
>
>
